Team
Blog
  1. Home
  2. Team principles
  3. Investment
22Team principle

Team Principle of Investment

The value of team development

What you invest in a team pays off – with a delay, and with interest.

In the original: The Law of Dividends

Seeds are planted, and for a long time nothing happens but a time bar ticking along. Then branches grow – slowly at first, then faster and faster.
In short

What you invest in a team pays off – with a delay, and with interest.

A team does not get better on its own. It gets better when someone puts time, money and attention into it: into training, into practicing together, into a lineup that is allowed to stay together. That is what this principle means by investment. A single team-building day is not enough.

In depth

The team principle in detail

Four steps through the principle: understand, check, connect, apply. Open any topic to read more.

The explanationThe return comes later. Today the exercise costs half a working day.
  • The return comes later.
  • Today the exercise costs half a working day.
  • The benefit shows only when the team comes under pressure and the coordination is second nature.
  • That is why it is so easy to cut back on: you see the costs immediately, but not the gain.

“Interest” is a metaphor. It stands for the way learning and familiarity build up over time.

Read closelyWhat the principle says – and what it doesn’t
At its core

Investing in a team works on average. That is the well-supported part of the statement.

Strictly speaking
Not every investment pays interest. The return depends on the content, on repetition and on the team staying together.
There is no automatic compound interest. Without refreshers, the effect of training fades again.
Socializing alone is a weak investment. Team building has a stronger effect on climate and processes than on performance. Training with clear content – coordination, communication, roles – has better evidence behind it.
The signs3 signs that the principle is at work · 3 that it is missing
The principle is at work
  • Practice and debriefs have a fixed place in the calendar.
  • Training sessions are repeated.
  • Proven teams stay together.
The principle is missing
  • Time for the team is the first thing to be cut when things get tight.
  • There are one-off events with no follow-up.
  • The team is constantly reshuffled and starts from scratch every time.
The research6 sources: 3 meta-analyses, 1 primary study, 1 review, 1 critique · 1999–2016 · with research limitations
6 sources1999–2016 time span3 Meta-analyses1 Review1 Critique1 Primary study
Research support
  1. low
  2. moderate
  3. high

Moderate to high – high for “investing in teams works” (three meta-analyses), moderate to low for “with a delay, and with interest,” because the image of compound interest has not been tested directly.

  1. 1999
    Review
    Robert L. Helmreich, Ashleigh C. Merritt & John A. Wilhelm

    Five generations of crew resource management since 1981. Training with repetition changes behavior; pilots’ acceptance, however, declines again over the years.

  2. 2006
    Critique / Review
    Eduardo Salas et al.

    28 CRM evaluations: positive participant reactions, but mixed findings on learning and behavior; no safety effect at the organizational level could be established.

  3. 2008
    Meta-analysis
    Eduardo Salas et al.

    93 effect sizes from 2,650 teams: team training is moderately positively related to cognitive, affective, process and performance outcomes. Among other things, training content and the stability of the lineup matter.

  4. 2009
    Meta-analysis
    Cameron Klein et al.

    Team building with four components (goal setting, relationships, problem solving, role clarification): a moderate positive effect overall, strongest on affective and process outcomes, weaker on performance.

  5. 2009
    Primary study
    Robert S. Huckman, Bradley R. Staats & David M. Upton

    Software projects at an Indian IT services company: the more often members had already worked together, the better the team performed.

  6. 2016
    Meta-analysis
    Ashley M. Hughes et al.

    129 studies in health care: team training improves satisfaction, learning and behavior; positive effects also on length of stay and mortality, though based on only a few primary studies.

Where the research reaches its limits
  • The meta-analyses show moderate effects, but no automatic compound interest: without refreshers, attitudes fade again after training.
  • For crew resource management in aviation, proof of “fewer accidents” still cannot be cleanly established.
  • That the investment grows over time is plausible as a rule, but not supported as a law.
Read more: what the research shows

Here, research looks at team training and team building – targeted interventions to develop teams – and at team familiarity, the shared experience that builds up when people have often worked together. A meta-analysis led by Eduardo Salas finds moderately strong positive relationships between team training and performance. Another, led by Cameron Klein, shows that team building works on average, more strongly on climate and processes than on performance. Ashley M. Hughes and colleagues confirm the benefits of team training in health care. Using software projects, Robert S. Huckman, Bradley R. Staats and David M. Upton show that teams perform better the more often their members have already worked together.

The originJohn C. Maxwell · “The Law of Dividends”
  1. 2001
    OriginJohn C. Maxwell

    The 17 Indisputable Laws of Teamwork

    • The Law of DividendsInvestment in a team multiplies over time
  2. today
    Expanded

    Added here is the condition the research names – the return comes only if the investment has substance and is renewed, and the team stays together.

More on the origin of the team principles

The related team principles21 Development · 11 Attunement · 09 Bench · 03 Size

The principle supports “Development”, “Attunement” and “Bench”.

It stands in tension with “Size” and with any practice of frequent reshuffling: if you keep reshuffling the team, you lose what it has built up.

The action steps5 steps: Invest in content, not just in morale
  1. Invest in content, not just in morale: practice coordination, communication and roles with your team on real tasks.
  2. Plan the repetition right from the start. Training without refreshers loses its effect.
  3. Keep well-established teams together wherever possible. People who have often worked together perform better on average.
  4. Expect a delay, and say so to those who sign off on the budget. Do not expect the return in the same quarter.
  5. Check honestly what an initiative has actually changed: behavior and results, not just good feedback at the end of the day.
The questions for your team3 questions for your team conversation: What have we really invested in as a team over the past year – and what of it is still having an effect today?
  1. What have we really invested in as a team over the past year – and what of it is still having an effect today?
  2. Which training or exercise should we refresh?
  3. Where are we losing the team capital we have built up because we reshuffle too often?

Take time for one question at your next team meeting. Talk about it openly and note down what you take away from it.

The picture to rememberSeeds are planted, and for a long time nothing happens but a time bar ticking along.
  1. Seeds are planted, and for a long time nothing happens but a time bar ticking along.
  2. Then branches grow – slowly at first, then faster and faster.
From real life

What the Team Principle of Investment looks like in practice

BusinessGovernmentUnited Flight 173

A Light That Stayed Off and an Hour in a Holding Pattern

On December 28, 1978, a United Airlines DC-8 with 189 people on board circles near Portland for about an hour because the landing gear indicator light stays dark – until the engines flame out from fuel starvation and ten people die. The industry responds with an investment in how crews work together.

The key pointWhat is invested in how people work together pays off with a delay – and the investment has to be renewed.
Read the full example
Sports & ArtsEducationLa Masia

33 Years to a Starting Eleven from the Club’s Own Academy

On October 20, 1979, FC Barcelona turns the La Masia farmhouse into a boarding school for young players. On November 25, 2012, in a 4–0 win at Levante, for the first time all eleven players on the field come from the club’s own academy.

The key pointPaid in year after year, harvested decades later – the later decline shows what happens when the investment stops.
Read the full example
BusinessEducationBell Labs

Long Corridors, Mixed Groups, Years of Time

In 1941, Bell Labs moves into a new building in Murray Hill with strikingly long corridors, so that colleagues cannot help running into one another. For the transistor, Mervin Kelly puts physicists, metallurgists and electrical engineers together in a group that works for more than two years – in 1947, John Bardeen, Walter Brattain and William Shockley achieve the breakthrough.

The key pointPatient investment in a team pays off with a delay, and with interest – but you have to be able to afford that kind of patience.
Read the full example
Examples

The Team Principle of Investment in practice

From every sphere of society.

BusinessGovernment

United Flight 173 and the Team Principle of Investment

In December 1978, an airliner crashes because three experienced men in the cockpit fail to communicate effectively with one another. The industry responds with an investment in how crews work together. The example shows that what you invest in a team pays off – with a delay, and with interest. And it shows that the investment has to be renewed.

Investment
Sports & ArtsEducation

La Masia and the Team Principle of Investment

In the fall of 1979, FC Barcelona turns an old farmhouse into a boarding school for young players. Thirty-three years later, eleven players from the club’s own academy take the field in a league match. La Masia shows that what you invest in a team pays off – with a delay, and with interest. The later decline shows what happens when the investment stops.

Investment
BusinessEducation

Bell Labs and the Team Principle of Investment

Bell Labs built long corridors, mixed physicists with engineers and gave its groups years to work. The results included the transistor, information theory and Unix. The example shows that what you invest in a team pays off – with a delay, and with interest. It also shows that you have to be able to afford that kind of patience.

Investment
EducationSports & ArtsFamily

Movie – McFarland, USA (2015)

In a poor small town, a coach with no prospects puts together a cross-country team of seven farmworkers’ sons. He gives them time, works alongside them in the fields and in the end turns down a better offer. The film shows that what you invest in a team pays off – with a delay, and with interest.

Investment
FAQ

Questions about the Team Principle of Investment

What does the Team Principle of Investment say?

What you invest in a team pays off – with a delay, and with interest. A team does not get better on its own. It gets better when someone puts time, money and attention into it: into training, into practicing together, into a lineup that is allowed to stay together. That is what this principle means by investment. A single team-building day is not enough.

How can I tell whether my team follows the Team Principle of Investment?

Practice and debriefs have a fixed place in the calendar. Training sessions are repeated. Proven teams stay together.

What can I do as a leader to put the Team Principle of Investment into practice?

Invest in content, not just in morale: practice coordination, communication and roles with your team on real tasks. Plan the repetition right from the start. Training without refreshers loses its effect.

How well is the Team Principle of Investment supported by research?

Research support: moderate to high – high for “investing in teams works” (three meta-analyses), moderate to low for “with a delay, and with interest,” because the image of compound interest has not been tested directly.

Where does the Team Principle of Investment come from?

The principle goes back to “The Law of Dividends” in John C. Maxwell’s “The 17 Indisputable Laws of Teamwork”, in essence: investment in a team multiplies over time. Added here is the condition the research names – the return comes only if the investment has substance and is renewed, and the team stays together.

What are some examples of the Team Principle of Investment?

Four examples show the principle: United Flight 173; La Masia; Bell Labs; the film “McFarland and USA” (2015).

Source: John C. Maxwell, The 17 Indisputable Laws of Teamwork · More on the origin

Your next step

Team development with WEGVISOR: make your team effective

Reading changes how you think. Applying changes your results. Choose how you’d like to continue.

Request Team Coaching

Tell us briefly what it’s about. We’ll get back to you to set up a meeting.

You came from: Team Principle of Investment.